Skip to content
SPM Tuition
Mathematics · Logical reasoning

Testing arguments with counterexamples

You must decide if an argument is valid, and because the conclusion sounds right you say yes.

An argument is valid if the conclusion must be true whenever the premises are true. To test it, try to build a case where the premises hold and the conclusion fails.

This is the last lesson in the logical reasoning chapter. It uses statements, negation and implications, so revisit writing implications and their converse if those feel shaky.

How do I test whether an argument is valid?

Assume both premises are true. Then ask whether you can imagine a situation where the conclusion is false. If you can, that situation is a counterexample and the argument is invalid.

Three forms come up most often, and each is valid when written correctly.

  1. All A are B. C is A. Therefore C is B.
  2. If p, then q. p is true. Therefore q is true.
  3. If p, then q. q is false. Therefore p is false.

Worked example: two arguments, one valid and one not

Argument 1. Premise 1: All multiples of 4 are even. Premise 2: 28 is a multiple of 4. Conclusion: 28 is even.

Try to break it. For the conclusion to be false, 28 would need to be odd.

But premise 1 says any multiple of 4 is even, and premise 2 says 28 is one. No counterexample exists, so the argument is valid. (Check: 28 = 4 × 7, which is even.)

Argument 2. Premise 1: All multiples of 4 are even. Premise 2: 18 is even. Conclusion: 18 is a multiple of 4.

Try to break it. Both premises are true. The conclusion is false, because 18 ÷ 4 = 4.5. So 18 is itself a counterexample, and the argument is invalid.

The two arguments use the same words, yet only one is valid. The direction of the reasoning decides which: Argument 1 goes from “multiple of 4” to “even”, and Argument 2 tries to go back.

The mistake that costs marks

The common slip is to accept an argument because the conclusion is true. Consider: “All multiples of 4 are even. 12 is even. Therefore 12 is a multiple of 4.”

The conclusion is true, since 12 = 4 × 3. The argument is still invalid.

Step Wrong Right
Check the conclusion 12 is a multiple of 4, so valid true here, but that is not the test
Look for a counterexample not attempted replace 12 with 10
Result with 10 not seen premises true, conclusion false
Decision valid invalid

Replacing 12 with 10 keeps the pattern and breaks the conclusion. A valid argument cannot survive that swap.

Check yourself

Decide whether this argument is valid. Premise 1: If a number is divisible by 6, then it is even. Premise 2: 20 is even. Conclusion: 20 is divisible by 6.

Answer

The argument is invalid. Both premises are true, since 20 is even and every number divisible by 6 is even. But 20 ÷ 6 is not a whole number, so the conclusion is false.

The mistake in the argument is using “q is true” to conclude “p is true”. A valid form needs either “p is true” or “q is false”.

What to study next

Apply the test to a claim from everyday life with proving or disproving an everyday mathematical claim. Then try the logical reasoning practice set.

The claim evidence revision desk gives you a structure for checking a claim against evidence. For lessons with a teacher, see online one-to-one Mathematics tuition.

Common questions

What does a valid argument mean?

An argument is valid when the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. Validity is about the reasoning, not about whether the premises are actually true. A valid argument can still have a false conclusion if a premise is false.

How do I show that an argument is invalid?

Find a counterexample: a situation where every premise is true but the conclusion is false. One such situation is enough. If none exists, the argument is valid.

Can an invalid argument have a true conclusion?

Yes. The conclusion may be true by luck, while the reasoning does not guarantee it. That is why the test looks at the reasoning and not at the conclusion alone.

What are the common valid forms?

Three forms appear often: all A are B and C is A, so C is B; if p then q and p, so q; if p then q and not q, so not p. Practise each with a fresh example instead of learning only the labels.

If you judge an argument by whether its conclusion sounds true, one-to-one Mathematics lessons let a teacher show you how to test the reasoning itself, using your own exam-style questions.

  • Online one-to-one lessons for your child with an experienced teacher.
  • Your first class is a one-hour trial, from RM50. The fee is agreed before you book.
  • Happy with the teacher? Continue with lessons of about 1.5 hours. If not, ask for another teacher.